Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.utpl.edu.ec/jspui/handle/123456789/18779
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGomez Alvarado, H.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorGuaman Bastidas, F.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorBenitez Hurtado, J.es_ES
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-16T22:02:21Z-
dc.date.available2017-06-16T22:02:21Z-
dc.date.issued2016-07-25es_ES
dc.identifier.isbn21660727es_ES
dc.identifier.issn978-989984346-2es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.utpl.edu.ec/handle/123456789/18779-
dc.description.abstractAccording to the principle of legality, impartial judicial procedures should be adopted in a court of law. In this study, we analyzed this principle by examining judicial decisions. We determined that court judgments consist of an emotional content, which implies that the principle of neutrality is not fully met. However, our initial findings generate sufficient evidence to identify the existence of an emotional inference mechanism in judicial decisions.es_ES
dc.languageIngléses_ES
dc.subjectSentencees_ES
dc.subjectsemanticses_ES
dc.subjectpolarityes_ES
dc.subjectartificial intelligencees_ES
dc.subjecttext algorithms.es_ES
dc.titleSemantic Analysis Of Judicial Sentences Based On Text Polarityes_ES
dc.typeArticlees_ES
dc.publisherIberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies, CISTIes_ES
Appears in Collections:Artículos de revistas Científicas



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.