El control abstracto de constitucionalidad de los actos normativos en relación con la exclusión del recurso de apelación del auto de llamamiento a juicio

Abstract

The research addressed related to abstract control of constitutionality in Ecuador, its historical background, different doctrinal positions with the passage of time has taken the academy and constitutional justice around the world face the issue of normative acts that are in violation of rights constitutional. Fundamental aspects of the intermediate stage and the order for trial, highlighting the main interventions that procedural subjects should be formulated in the proceedings, primarily in preparatory hearings to trial, with emphasis on the roles to be fulfilled are detailed the judges and prosecutors in these stages. The legal significance of both the rights to an effective remedy and the right to challenge the rulings provided for in Articles 75 and 76 of the Constitution was discussed. The judgment of the Constitutional Court regarding the constitutional claim filed against the reforms to Article 343 paragraph 1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure their respective conclusion, and effects were analyzed.