Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dspace.utpl.edu.ec/handle/123456789/19182
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCastillo Monroy, A.es_ES
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-16T22:03:05Z-
dc.date.available2013-11-13es_ES
dc.date.available2017-06-16T22:03:05Z-
dc.date.submitted01/02/2014es_ES
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2013.11.010es_ES
dc.identifier.isbn9648305es_ES
dc.identifier.otherhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2013.11.010es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.utpl.edu.ec/handle/123456789/19182-
dc.description.abstractThe soil block test is widely used in North America for evaluating the decay resistance of various wood-based materials. One drawback of this test is that soils from different sources may result in variable wood weight losses. Developing more definitive screening criteria for soils would help select soils that would be most appropriate for use in these procedures. Soils from seven different sources were characterized for soil texture, pH, water holding capacity, C:N ratio, bulk density and then used in soil block tests against two white rot and two brown rot fungi. While there were substantial differences in soil characteristics, none of the parameters were correlated with wood weight loss. The results illustrate the difficulty in predicting fungal behavior in laboratory tests based upon soil characteristics.es_ES
dc.languageIngléses_ES
dc.subjectbrown rotes_ES
dc.subjectsoil block testes_ES
dc.subjectsoil texturees_ES
dc.subjectwater holding capacityes_ES
dc.subjectwhite rotes_ES
dc.titleThe Soil Block Test: Potential for improving our understanding of the role of soil source on performancees_ES
dc.typeArticlees_ES
dc.publisherInternational Biodeterioration and Biodegradationes_ES
Appears in Collections:Artículos de revistas Científicas

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.