Preferencias académicas de los estudiantes de la carrera de Derecho y su vinculación con los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) a través del estudio de la sentencia

Abstract

Abstract: Articles 24 and 25 of the Amendment Law to the Children and Adolescents Code provide the penalties for the subsidiary obligors on alimony; the article deals with the personal pressure for those who do not comply with the alimony; however, a group of parents considers that the measure of personal urgency for the subsidiary obligors is a highly damaging measure against them since this constitutes that passing food in a subsidiary manner would be in danger of losing their job and consequently they would stop pass food to the principals as well as to the subsidiaries. The Constitutional Court, considering these aspects, rules that the personal urgency for food falls on the main oblige and not in the subsidiary obligor, for which reason it declares the unconstitutionality of this article and reforms the consequent articles with respect to taking alternative measures for those who are declared subsidiary obligors. Considering ODS N°16 seeks to strengthen state institutions, this provision is related to the ruling of the Constitutional Court, which thus seeks justice for all.