Preferencias académicas de los estudiantes de la carrera de Derecho y su vinculación con los objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) a través del estudio de sentencias

Abstract

Abstract: In this case reference is made to JudgmentNo. 072-17-SEP-CC. Case No. 1587-15-EP189. Mrs. Lourdes Julieta Salinas Quevedo filed a protection action against the Ministry of Education, in which she indicated that her rights had been violated 189 Ecuador Constitutional Court of Ecuador, they notified her with the suppression of her job without taking into consideration who was pregnant.Indicates that there are two moments in which their rights are violated constitutional, the first to notify the suppression of his game when it had with 33 weeks of gestation; and the second, when making the payment of compensation corresponding to the suppression of his departure, five months after being dismissed from office.That is why the Court establishes that the rights to material equality against pregnant women in the context employment, to due process in guaranteeing motivation, legal certainty and effective judicial protection, guaranteeing material equality in the labor context, identifying the unequal power relations suffered by pregnant women and establishing the obligation of the State to issue the necessary measures to protect and guarantee the rights of pregnant and breastfeeding women in the workplace. In addition, it incorporates gender and human rights approaches.