Preferencias académicas de los estudiantes de la Carrera de Derecho y su vinculación con los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) a través de estudio de sentencias.

Abstract

Abstract: Academic preferences and connection with the SDGs through sentences determine the research topic; the objective is to understand the SDGs and relate them to the sentence. The investigation begins with the conflict between two regulations of the COIP, transit matter Art. 147 provides for the trial of a case is exclusive to the judge and that in accordance with Art. 229 of the COFJ orders that a judge will be responsible for knowing, substantiate and dictate sentence; while Article 608, numeral 6 of the COIP states the call for trial that must be by a judge or court other than the one that initiated the process; In this relationship, the conflict between these regulations could be determined. The Constitutional Court rejects the request for consultation because it states that the regulations are clear and explains that the grounds of the magistrates determine that there is no conflict since the rule is express, the traffic judge is exclusive of knowing a case from beginning to end; therefore, the traffic judge should proceed with the summons to trial and not excuse herself.