Preferencias académicas de los estudiantes de la carrera de Derecho y su vinculación con los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) a través del estudio de sentencias

Abstract

Abstract: This work is part of the analysis of the filing of an Extraordinary Protection Action, in the area of Administrative Law a controversy arises between the Metropolitan Public Company of Drinking Water and Sanitation of Quito and the Institute Ecuadorian Social Security, in due course a judgment of resolution was issued, to which, the EPMAPS files an appeal in cassation, , which was denied by the Administrative Litigation Chamber of the National Court of Justice, reason for which it subsequently requests an Extraordinary Action for Protection of the judgment issued, alleging that there was a lack of motivation because it should have been reasonably stated, logical and understandable judgment, also indicating the legal rules that have been applied and their relevance, in the same way, indicate a particular impact on the transitional provisions of the Organic Law on Civil Service and Administrative Career (LOSCCA), as well as the Social Security Law and the Resolutions that have been issued by the Superior Council of the IESS.