Preferencias académicas de los estudiantes de la carrera de Derecho y su vinculación con los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) a través del estudio de sentencias

Abstract

Abstract:The Judgment analyzed is No. 1040-14-EP/20, within criminal trial No. 17291-2013- 0002, where the plaintiff María Petrona Cabascango followed suit against the Mrs. María Sofía Cuascota, for the crime of insults, where the judge ratified the state of innocence of the defendant, before that an appeal was filed, which later was dismissed, and then an appeal that was declared abandoned on 28 April 2014, therefore, Mrs. Cabascango filed an extraordinary action for protection. The Constitutional Court resolved: Accept the present extraordinary action of protection and Declare violated the constitutional right to due process. Can identify that SDG 16.1 is involved, which refers in its sense to the right of access to justice and that the right to defense acts jointly with the other guarantees of a process. If the right to defense could not lead to nullity in the process, therefore It should be noted that the right to defense has been introduced in the Magna Carta.