Preferencias académicas de los estudiantes de la carrera de Derecho y su vinculación con los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) a través del estudio de sentencias

Abstract

Abstract: The present Titling work called: "Academic preferences of the students of the Career of Law and it s link with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG), through the study of sentences" is aimed at all university students of the career of Law, to meet and enforce these objectives, which are defined as "a universal call to end poverty, caring for the planet and ensuring that people enjoy peace and prosperity by 2030." The judgment under investigation, registered under No. 719-12-EP/20, deals with the fact that the Constitutional Court finds that there is a violation of legal certainty and due process in the guarantee of compliance with norms, because the judge who substantiated a protection action did not issue a sentence verbally in open court, nor did he justify this omission in a reasoned manner. The Court confirmed that another judge other than the one who held the public hearing issued the written sentence. Consequently, the Court accepts the extraordinary protective actions proposed in the case. Violated rights contemplated by SDG No.16.