Preferencias académicas de los estudiantes de la carrera de Derecho y su vinculación con los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) a través del estudio de sentencias

Abstract

Abstract: This research bases its study on two premises, the right to work and the right to health, since the right to work, as well as the right to health, are guaranteed within the constitution, however, ruling N °. 1095-20-EP/22 clearly demonstrates the violation of the right to due process in the guarantee of motivation, enshrined in the Magna Carta art. 76 numeral 7 literal l, this is why the constitutional court considers that the protection action filed by the plaintiff Robinson Alfredo Orellana Parra should be accepted, referring to the violation of the right to due process in the guarantee of motivation, it is necessary to clarify that by not protecting his job stability and the plaintiff being a person from the vulnerability group due to his catastrophic illness, his situation was not correctly analyzed and therefore, the ruling clearly violates the guarantee of motivation. Constitutional rights were created to guarantee the rights of people as such, which is why the law protects them so that they are not violated. In this case, Sustainable Development Goal No. 16, since the poor conduct of the administrative and judicial authorities is evident in this sentence, the violation of the right was demonstrated.