Preferencias académicas de los estudiantes de la carrera de Derecho y su vinculación con los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) a través del estudio de sentencias

Abstract

Abstract: This research is based on the analysis and study of the Development Objective Sustainable No. 16, its application and its connection with the cassation ruling in case No. 1823-2014, the Judges of the National Court of Justice made up of Dr. Gladys Terán Sierra as National judge rapporteur; Judge Dr. Vicente Robalino Villafuerte; and Doctor Luis Enríquez Villacis, admit the appeal filed by the plaintiffs Sixto Manuel Parrales Choez and Edison Armando Ortega Santos and modify the sentence to EIGHT YEARS OF ORDINARY MAJOR CONCLUSION, due to the misinterpretation of the law, to the plaintiffs had to serve the sentence for simple manslaughter and not for murder. HE evidence that within this context the judicial institutions are weak, since it has been demonstrated the lightness with which lower-level judges apply the law, according to the investigation, analysis and study carried out in case No. 1823-2014, it is noted that the poor interpretation of the law affects Sustainable Development Goal No. 16 and increasingly justice bodies are unreliable, which implies that we are not complying to the Sustainable Development Goals.