Preferencias académicas de los estudiantes de la Carrera de Derecho y su vinculación con los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) a través del estudio de sentencias

Abstract

Abstract: This is an analysis of ruling No. 2231-22-JP/23, issued by the highest body of Constitutional Justice in Ecuador, a ruling that constitutes a binding precedent and mandatory observation and compliance in the specific case and is the basis for analogous cases. The Constitutional Court recognized that in Ecuador there has been a misuse of the jurisdictional guarantees because they do not correspond to the guardianship and protection of a constitutional law, the ruling concludes that the judges have been denaturalizing a jurisdictional guarantee and have also contravened provisions express legal provisions affecting the rights of the parties and transgressing rights constitutional. The Court also determined the possibility of constitutional judges being prosecuted. for the crime of prevarication when they process or resolve jurisdictional guarantees violating express procedural rules, clarifying what was determined in sentence 141-18-SEP-CC, issued by the Constitutional Court in 2018 that would have completely excluded the possibility of constitutional judges being prosecuted for the crime of malfeasance.