Preferencias académicas de los estudiantes de la carrera de Derecho y su vinculación con los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible a través del estudio de sentencias

Abstract

Abstract: It is general knowledge that throughout history in Ecuador, an inherited culture was naturally and positively established, in which the mother, because she was a woman, was considered the ideal person to care for the children, discrediting the man's ability to exercise the care and protection of them, which is why this controversy had another counterpart in which society for many years lived under a sexist temperance, where the taboo created in society designated that man could not carry out household activities in which for sectioned indicator corresponded to women; Thus, today through the legal and social evolution of our country we have managed to break the paradigm of suitability with sex specification, therefore in current times we are governed by a constitution and other legal bodies that guarantee rights where parental authority It appears legally in the Code of Childhood and Adolescence and also in the Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador in its Art. 69, responsible motherhood and paternity and the obligation to care for children are established, therefore in this investigation, it will be established and will analyze what is stated in Art. 106 numerals 2 and 4 of the Code of Children and Adolescents, where the Constitutional Court through ruling 28-15-IN-21 makes it evident that the applicability of this norm violates the effective protection of rights of the father and minor children incurring discrimination with a gender perspective, the best interests of the child and gender equality among others, therefore the conclusive ruling of the Constitutional Court changes the perspective of applicability and exclusive right to a gender and specific sex.