Preferencias académicas de los estudiantes de la Carrera de Derecho y su vinculación con los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) a través del estudio de sentencias

Abstract

Abstract: The research work has the purpose of carrying out a critical and legal analysis with the objective of analyzing the sentence of extraordinary protection action number 1634-17- EP/22, ruling where rights are violated such as: right to legal certainty, right to effective judicial protection, right to appeal and access to justice. In connection with the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) number 16. This goal is based mainly on achieve peace, justice and solid institutions, with the sole objective of guaranteeing the right to justice, in such a way, to facilitate both citizens in general and entities public can access justice, which must be of quality, free and efficient. By Therefore, the sentence studied brings up a clear example of the violation of rights by the administrators of justice, by denying a de facto appeal and not admitting the respective cassation appeal on a resolution issued by said judge, being The inadmissibility of this appeal was an arbitrary action that prevented the plaintiff entity from access justice.