Preferencias académicas de los estudiantes de la carrera de Derecho y su vinculación con los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) a través del estudio de sentencias

Abstract

Abstract: This case involves the dispute of an applicant for the National Police, excluded from the selection process. recruitment due to an ovarian cyst. The Constitutional Court analyzes the legality and constitutionality, highlighting the extensive list of medical disabilities and questioning the justification of ovarian cyst. It is determined that the measure was disproportionate, affecting unequally to women and violating the right to equality and non-discrimination in a manner that negatively affects SDG No. 5, which aims to promote equality between genders and empower all women and girls. The Police must reevaluate rules, guarantee objective and reasonable justification and ensure equal access to education since the applicant saw her life project affected and the delay in entering education police; which is linked to SDG No. 4 Quality Education that highlights the importance of education for sustainable development, equity and the eradication of poverty. Although the plaintiff went to the Police, the violation was recognized and measures were ordered of non-repetition, evaluation of regulations and supervision to guarantee rights and avoid retaliation.