Preferencias académicas de los estudiantes de la Carrera de Derecho y su vinculación con los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) a través del estudio de sentencias

Abstract

Abstract: Observe the close relationship to violations of constitutional principles and rights. Using ruling No. 2158-17-EP/21, the vulnerability of the principle of best interest of girls, boys and adolescents who often have a sentence or order issued by judges, who do not comply with what is stated in article 1 of the New Constitution made in Montecristi, where it tells us that since 2008 Ecuador became a state of rights and justice. We see how the children were harmed with more than two years of alimony since said alimony is determined from the date the defendant was summoned and not from the date the lawsuit was filed. The Fundamental Standard requires us to consider the urgency and importance in the protection of the rights of girls, boys and adolescents, we see that the judges in question did not carry out the required weighing, in its substantive dimension, they did not respect the right of children to have their interest superior is a primary consideration. Judges always have to see that the plaintiff represents her children who have the right to alimony, a right that is intricately connected to the realization of the right to a dignified life and the related rights of children and adolescents.