Preferencias académicas de los estudiantes de la Carrera de Derecho y su vinculación con los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) a través del estudio de sentencias

Abstract

Abstract: The analyzed case refers to a habeas corpus action filed by the Regional Foundation for Human Rights Assistance (INREDH) on behalf of Sara Moya Conforme, challenging the judgment issued by the judges of the Second Criminal Chamber of the National Court of Justice. The parties involved include the petitioners, the judges of the Second Criminal Chamber, the Attorney General of the State, and the director of the Women's Social Rehabilitation Center in Quito. The judges' decision was based on technical and formal criteria, omitting constitutional norms that protect the rights of pregnant women and their personal integrity, as well as the lack of proportionality in the measure taken. The Constitutional Court declared a violation of constitutional rights to legal security and due process, accepting the extraordinary protection action and issuing comprehensive repair measures. These measures include nullifying the judgments issued by the judges of the Second Criminal and Labor Chamber, Childhood and Adolescence, as well as the requirement of public apologies to the affected party, the dissemination of the judgment among relevant judicial authorities, the investigation of responsibilities and sanctions, verification of minimum guarantees for persons deprived of their liberty, and the publication of the judgment on the institutional website portal. In summary, the Constitutional Court vindicated the violated rights and established measures to prevent their repetition and ensure the protection of the fundamental rights of the affected individuals.