Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://dspace.utpl.edu.ec/handle/123456789/69532
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | López-Rodríguez, Fausto | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Rosado, Daniel | es_ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-10-25T22:33:30Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-10-25T22:33:30Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.issn | 03014797 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.other | 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.12.043 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.other | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85007048883&doi=10.1016%2fj.jenvman.2016.12.043&partnerID=40&md5=7fbca8c412a9eb5b4c7c99163a3885f7 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.other | CODEN: JEVMA | es_ES |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dspace.utpl.edu.ec/bitstreams/2-s2.0-85007048883.pdf | es_ES |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dspace.utpl.edu.ec/handle/123456789/69532 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Protected areas are home to biodiversity, habitats and ecosystem as well as a critical component of human well-being and a generator of leisure-related revenues. However, management is sometimes unsatisfactory and requires new ways of evaluation. Management effectiveness of 36 protected areas in southern Ecuador have been assessed. The protected areas belong to three categories: Heritage of Natural Areas of the Ecuadorian State (PANE), created and funded by the State, Areas of Forest and Protective Vegetation (ABVP), created but no funded by the State, and private reserves, declared and funded by private entities. Management effectiveness was evaluated by answers of managers of the protected areas to questionnaires adapted to the socio-economic and environmental characteristics of the region. Questions were classified into six elements of evaluation: context, planning, inputs, processes, outputs and outcomes as recommended by IUCN. Results were classified into four levels: unsatisfactory, slightly satisfactory, satisfactory and very satisfactory. The PANE areas and private reserves showed higher management effectiveness levels (satisfactory and very satisfactory) than ABVP areas, where slightly satisfactory and unsatisfactory levels prevailed. Resources availability was found as the main reason behind this difference. The extension, age and province of location were found irrelevant. Outputs, inputs and processes require main efforts to improve management effectiveness. Improving planning and input in the PANE areas and inputs and outcomes on ABVP areas is necessary to obtain a similar result in all areas. © 2016 Elsevier Ltd | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
dc.source | Volume: 190 | es_ES |
dc.source | Scopus | es_ES |
dc.source | Journal of Environmental Management, Volume: 190 | es_ES |
dc.subject | Biodiversity | es_ES |
dc.subject | Conservation of Natural Resources | es_ES |
dc.subject | Ecosystem | es_ES |
dc.subject | Ecuador | es_ES |
dc.subject | Environmental Policy | es_ES |
dc.subject | Forests | es_ES |
dc.subject | Humans | es_ES |
dc.subject | Planning Techniques | es_ES |
dc.subject | Private Sector | es_ES |
dc.subject | Ecuador | es_ES |
dc.subject | Biodiversity | es_ES |
dc.subject | Conservation | es_ES |
dc.subject | Economics | es_ES |
dc.subject | Environmental protection | es_ES |
dc.subject | Forestry | es_ES |
dc.subject | Leisure | es_ES |
dc.subject | Classifieds | es_ES |
dc.subject | Critical component | es_ES |
dc.subject | Economic growths | es_ES |
dc.subject | Ecuador | es_ES |
dc.subject | Effectiveness evaluation | es_ES |
dc.subject | Management effectiveness | es_ES |
dc.subject | National parks | es_ES |
dc.subject | Protected areas | es_ES |
dc.subject | Southern ecuador | es_ES |
dc.subject | Well being | es_ES |
dc.subject | economic analysis | es_ES |
dc.subject | economic growth | es_ES |
dc.subject | environmental management | es_ES |
dc.subject | national park | es_ES |
dc.subject | protected area | es_ES |
dc.subject | resource availability | es_ES |
dc.subject | socioeconomic status | es_ES |
dc.subject | sustainable development | es_ES |
dc.subject | tourism development | es_ES |
dc.subject | economic development | es_ES |
dc.subject | Ecuador | es_ES |
dc.subject | forest | es_ES |
dc.subject | human | es_ES |
dc.subject | inheritance | es_ES |
dc.subject | manager | es_ES |
dc.subject | national park | es_ES |
dc.subject | questionnaire | es_ES |
dc.subject | sustainable development | es_ES |
dc.subject | tourism | es_ES |
dc.subject | vegetation | es_ES |
dc.subject | biodiversity | es_ES |
dc.subject | ecosystem | es_ES |
dc.subject | Ecuador | es_ES |
dc.subject | environmental policy | es_ES |
dc.subject | environmental protection | es_ES |
dc.subject | organization and management | es_ES |
dc.subject | private sector | es_ES |
dc.subject | procedures | es_ES |
dc.subject | Sustainable development | es_ES |
dc.title | Management effectiveness evaluation in protected areas of southern Ecuador | es_ES |
dc.type | Article | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Academic Press | es_ES |
Appears in Collections: | Artículos de revistas Científicas |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.