La falta de fundamentación legal en la interposición del Recurso de Casación en Materia Civil, como uno de los principales motivos para negar el recurso.

Abstract

This research work analyzes and explains what the basic points are that the litigants must consider when to pursue and justify the remedy of appeal, because as this is an extraordinary remedy is not enough to enunciate the rules infringed and the reason given, but on the contrary it is a priority to determine if the defect or error of law, fundamental to the competent judges of the National Court of Justice, can not marry in a single element is in the judgment or order which ends the processes of knowledge, partial or full degree the coming judgment, but also achieve unify criteria for the right and procedural truth and leading to the creation of binding precedent and eliminating the bad habit of the litigants that through their attorneys, defenders proceed to lodge an appeal solely for the purpose of delaying the execution of a sentence. This research is based and covered in Art. 3 and 6 of the Law of Cassation force and Art. 266 and following of the Code General Process which will take effect from May 2016.