Estudio comparado y socio-jurídico de la unión de hecho desde el caso ecuatoriano con el caso húngaro

Abstract

Abstract:From the legal point of view differs from marriage by formal clauses, the objective is to conduct a comparative and socio-legal study, which establishes differences, determines similarities, analyzes social, doctrinal and jurisprudential aspects. The concubinage exists a long time ago, it was admitted as a legal institution in the Hummrabi Code, we now know it as a Union of Fact, socially and judicially, by economic, ideological, cultural, religious factors without existing difference between legitimate and illegitimate family, in Hungary it is called Civil Union. The methodologies used were qualitative and quantitative. Research methods based on opinion and observation were applied. It is concluded that in both Ecuadorian and Hungarian society this form of cohabitation has been adopted as a family regime, in order to register it, one must express one's will and the cohabitants must be single. The obligations and responsibilities in the two countries are similar to those of marriage, for their separation must resolve the economic aspect at the notarial level. There are certain differences between Ecuador and Hungary, such as the widow's pension, adoption and the legal body through which their rights are established.