La implementación de tasas judiciales en procesos no sociales seguidos por la banca privada

Abstract

Abstract: The Ecuadorian judicial system currently guarantees the access of all people to justice both in the procedural aspect and its different phases, since the state has a social purpose, but is it really focusing gratuity towards the benefit of those most in need? , it is necessary to investigate whether it is feasible to implement a judicial collection rate for certain judicial processes, thereby achieving equity within the social aspect, this judicial rate would be focused on private banks who use the judicial system taking advantage of the subsidy granted by the state but only with the purpose of private profit, there is a contradiction, because with the gratuity of justice it is intended that the costs are not an impediment for people to access the judicial system. Gratuity to private banking entities would not be necessary in executive collection lawsuits initiated by these entities for private profit since they enjoy financial solvency, so if the payment of said tax would be required, this would not prevent them from accessing Justice.