Estudio de las acciones extraordinarias de protección

Abstract

Abstract:The objective was to analyze three judgments of extraordinary protection action, issued by the Constitutional Court of Ecuador: the first, judgment No. 097-16-SEP-CC, for an alleged violation of the right to due process; In the second judgment No. 098-16-SEP-CC, it was stated that the judgment did not state the legal norms or principles or the relevance of their application to the background of the fact, therefore, it requested that the Constitutional Court declare the violation of the right to motivation; and, finally, judgment 099-16-SEP-CC, for the alleged violation of the right to motivation and legal security. This made it possible to analyze the arguments that led to the Constitutional Court, accept or reject the extraordinary protection actions proposed, declare or not the violation of the rights alleged in these three judgments. Similarly, based on the three cases, four chapters were developed: 1. theoretical framework; 2. materials and methods; 3. results; and 4. discussion, the final result being the fulfillment of the general objective, allowing us to carry out a study through a critical, normative, legal and doctrinal analysis.