Preferencias académicas de los estudiantes de la carrera de Derecho y su vinculación con los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) a través del estudio de sentencias

Abstract

Abstract:.Based on the reviewed sentence, which was the fundamental basis for conducting this investigation, certain inconsistencies and shortcomings on the part of the officials were observed after the review. It should be noted that the events that occurred and the evidence obtained at the time of the incident were documented on park cameras. The ruling was in favor of the aggressor in the first instance and not the victim. In this regard, an injustice is being committed against her rights. Therefore, she requests that the matter be sentenced in a manner that respects her rights. However, the ruling was reversed in the second instance, issuing a prison sentence of nineteen years. In this case, the ruling is controversial due to the erroneous application of Article 171, paragraph 1, section 2 of the COIP (Commonwealth Code) instead of section 1. What happened in this case cannot be repeated with other people. As future lawyers, we must review each case thoroughly to enforce the law.