Preferencias académicas de los estudiantes de la carrera de derecho y su vinculación con los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) a través del estudio de sentencias

Abstract

Abstract:This paper analyzes Judgment No. 371 issued by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights regarding the case of Women Victims of Sexual Torture and Cruel Treatment in Atenco vs. Mexico. This judgment details the events that occurred in 2006, determining the violation of several rights, including the right to gender equality, the right to physical, sexual, and psychological personal integrity, and the right to non-discrimination. These rights were violated in the case of 11 women protesting. The aggressors were state officials under the authority of municipal and federal officials. Therefore, within the respective analysis, it has been deemed necessary to address the issue of human rights, since similarities have been found in the aims and objectives that this area pursues. This seeks to establish the points of controversy in order to carry out the respective analysis of the Sustainable Development Goals, which determines that SDG 5 has the same characteristics, and based on this, its content is challenged by linking the perceptions and references determined through these instruments to build on this research.