Preferencias académicas de los estudiantes de la carrera de Derecho y su vinculación con los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) a través del estudio de sentencias

Abstract

Abstract: This paper analyzes the judgment No. 673-17-EP/23, issued by the Constitutional Court of Ecuador, in civil matters. This case involves a homeless person with visual impairment, illiteracy, low economic resources, who could not access a birth certificate or his identity card, violating rights. The main objective of this research is to evaluate the legal implications of this ruling and its relationship with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) No. 1 (No poverty) No. 16 (Peace, justice and strong institutions), proposing alternatives to guarantee equality, non-discrimination and the protection of fundamental rights of vulnerable groups. Through a documentary and critical analysis of the judgment, as instruments of legal and doctrinal analysis. The results show omissions in due process, effective judicial protection, and guarantee of motivation. It is concluded that despite the fact that it grants economic compensation, the need for inclusive public policies, effective legal mechanisms to guarantee access to justice and comprehensive reparation of fundamental rights persists.