Preferencias académicas de los estudiantes de la carrera de Derecho y su vinculación con los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) a través del estudio de sentencias

Abstract

Abstract: The present work whose topic corresponds to the academic preferences of Law School students and their connection with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) through the study of sentences, in which it was developed through the analysis of sentence No. 005-16-SEP-CC, from the Constitutional Court, for this a descriptive, analytical and bibliographic research was carried out; in relation to Sustainable Development Goal 16: Peace, justice and solid institutions, protecting peace, stability, human rights and effective governance based on the rule of law. In the ruling of the Ecuadorian Constitution Constitutional Court, it refers to a dispute over the legitimacy of the participation of a lawyer in an oral hearing in a cassation appeal. In which the court must determine whether the appellant's rights to effective judicial protection and a fair trial have been violated. The court will analyze whether the decision of the lower court to declare the appeal abandoned due to the absence of the appellant and his lawyer was legal and fair. In conclusion, the case raises important questions about the guarantees of due process and effective judicial protection in Ecuadorian law. The court's decision will likely have significant implications for the rights of litigants and may affect how courts handle appeals in future.