Motivación en las sentencias emitidas por los jueces de primer nivel en Ecuador.

Abstract

Abstract: This thesis analyzes the motivation in the sentences of first-level judges, highlighting its relevance as a guarantee of due process and protection of the rights of the parties. Through the exhaustive analysis of the relevant regulations and jurisprudence, common deficiencies in the motivation of sentences are identified, such as non-existence, insufficiency and appearance. In addition, the effects of poor motivation on the legitimacy of the judicial system and public trust are evaluated. The methodology used includes the selection and analysis of a specific sentence, applying sufficiency and correct motivation questionnaires to evaluate its justification. The results obtained highlight the need to improve the quality of motivation in judicial decisions to guarantee a more transparent and equitable justice. Finally, recommendations are proposed to strengthen the training of judges and establish mechanisms for reviewing and controlling sentences, thus contributing to a more reliable and efficient judicial system. This study provides a comprehensive review of the importance of judicial motivation and its impact on the administration of justice.