Motivación en las sentencias emitidas por los jueces de primer nivel en Ecuador

Abstract

Abstract: This curriculum integration project focuses on the analysis and evaluation of the motivation behind judgments issued by first-level judges. Using the "EL SER" technique and specific evaluation questionnaires, a representative judgment (a case involving the collection of a promissory note) is broken down and examined to identify strengths and weaknesses in the normative and factual basis. The results show that, although the minimum formal requirements are met, there are gaps in the comprehensive articulation of arguments, which can affect the clarity of the decision and the right to defense. This study proposes improvements in the continuing education of judicial officials and in the implementation of internal review mechanisms aimed at optimizing the quality, coherence, and transparency of judicial arguments. This contributes to the improvement of the justice system and the strengthening of legal certainty. The contribution of this research lies in offering a methodological tool that enables continuous improvement in judicial practice, promoting a more equitable and efficient administration of justice with rigor.