Motivación en las sentencias emitidas por los jueces de primer nivel en Ecuador

Abstract

Abstract: This curriculum integration project focuses on the analysis and evaluation of the motivation behind judgments issued by first-level judges. Using the "EL SER" technique and specific evaluation questionnaires, a representative judgment (a protection action) is broken down and examined to identify strengths and weaknesses in its normative and factual basis. The research and the results are based on the analysis of Judgment No. 09327-2020-00555 related to a protection action. Although the minimum formal requirements are met, there are gaps in the comprehensive articulation of arguments, which can affect the clarity of the decision and the right to defense. This study proposes improvements in the continuing education of judicial officials and in the implementation of internal review mechanisms aimed at optimizing the quality, coherence, and transparency of judicial argumentation. Thus, it contributes to the improvement of the justice system and the strengthening of legal certainty. The contribution of this research lies in offering a methodological tool that enables continuous improvement in judicial practice, promoting a more equitable and efficient administration of justice with rigor.