Preferencias académicas de los estudiantes de la carrera de Derecho y su vinculación con los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) a través del estudio de sentencias

Abstract

Abstract: The research, titled "Academic Preferences of Law Students and Their Connection to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) through the Study of Judgments," aims to identify factors that contribute to the education of graduates. Judgment No. 1847-18-EP/23, an extraordinary action for protection by the Constitutional Court of Ecuador, is examined from a jurisprudential perspective. The judgment was issued within the framework of a review of judgments issued in the first and second instances and the ruling inadmissible in a criminal case. Following a review, the Constitutional Court confirmed that the decision adopted by the first-level judge omitted to address the request for conditional suspension of the sentence, as it verified a violation of the right to due process in ensuring observance of the procedural requirements of each proceeding. The ruling issued by the Court is related to SDG No. 16, which guaranteed effective access to justice.