Preferencias académicas de los estudiantes de la carrera de Derecho y su vinculación con los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) a través del estudio de sentencias

Abstract

Abstract: This jurisprudential analysis examines Judgment No. 159-16-SEP-CC in the report of Judge Patricio Pazmiño Freire of the Constitutional Court of Ecuador, in an extraordinary action for protection filed by Mr. Manuel Eugenio Morocho Quinteros and Mr. Efraín Marcelo Matute Molina, acting as mayor of Azogues and municipal attorney general, against the judgment issued on July 6, 2010, by the Specialized Criminal and Traffic Chamber of the Provincial Court of Justice of Cañar. The plaintiffs allege that their rights to due process and effective judicial protection were violated. The arguments of the claim arise around the decision issued in the second instance given that the principles of reasonableness and logic were not determined, since the Provincial Chamber should have observed the requirement of a merit-based and competitive examination pursuant to Article 228 of the Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador. The Court's decision was to overturn the rulings of previous instances and dismiss the protection action, giving priority to and respecting due process.