La motivación según la jurisprudencia de la Corte Constitucional

Abstract

Abstract: This thesis presents a jurisprudential analysis of reasoning (motivación), one of the most fundamental guarantees of due process. It seeks to address the following research question: ¿What are the criteria for assessing the violation of the guarantee of reasoning and its specific scenarios, according to the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court? To answer this question, the study is structured into two chapters. The first chapter examines the precedents established in judgments No. 1158-17-EP and No. 1852-21-EP/25, which set forth specific criteria for identifying defects in judicial reasoning. The second chapter analyzes the standards used to evaluate the reasoning of judicial decisions and outlines the scenarios recognized by constitutional jurisprudence in this regard. The final section presents the corresponding conclusions.