Uso de inteligencia artificial en los procesos judiciales línea de investigación: derecho, tecnología y sociedad

Abstract

Abstract: The present research work consists of the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in judicial processes, radically focused on the application within the judicial system of Ecuador, considering studies and some international precedent, such as the sentence handed down in Colombia by the Supreme Court. of justice, on the use of this technology. The Ruling of said Court highlighted both the advantages and risks associated with AI, emphasizing the need for a regulatory framework that guarantees transparency and respect for fundamental rights. This background will undoubtedly serve as a starting point to analyze how AI can be integrated into the Ecuadorian Judicial System. This research examines the possibilities and benefits that Artificial Intelligence offers to improve the administration of justice in our country, some of the benefits that would occur would be with respect to the reduction of procedural times, equitable access to information and the optimization of judicial decision making. At the same time, certain ethical, legal and technical challenges are identified that must be analyzed to guarantee that the implementation of AI respects due process and legal certainty. The objective lies fundamentally in carrying out a regulatory, doctrinal and comparative analysis, which allows us to review how the current regulations, specifically the General Organic Code of Processes (COGEP), can be adapted to regulate the use of these technologies that are intended to be implemented. Likewise, various regulatory guidelines have been proposed that promote the integration of AI in judicial processes, to strengthen confidence in our justice system, be efficient in conflict resolution and transparent in all judicial processes. The development of this document aims to provide and generate practical inputs for the development of public policies that can promote the responsible use of artificial intelligence in the judicial field.