Preferencias académicas de los estudiantes de la carrera de Derecho y su vinculación con los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) a través del estudio de sentencias

Abstract

Abstract: This analysis addresses Ruling No. 60-19-AN/23 of the Constitutional Court of Ecuador, which resolved an action for non-compliance in the case of the Kichwa Indigenous People of Sarayaku v. Ecuador, handed down by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in 2012. The objective was to evaluate the degree of state compliance with the reparations measures ordered against the Ecuadorian state. The research was conducted within the Ecuadorian legal context, using the constitutional file and case follow-up documents as a sample. Qualitative methods were applied, with document analysis and case law review techniques, using content files and analysis matrices as instruments. The degree of state compliance with the ordered reparations measures was evaluated: the removal of explosives from indigenous territory, prior consultation for extractive activities, and the adoption of regulations guaranteeing this right. In conclusion, it is found that the Ecuadorian state has achieved partial compliance, revealing structural deficiencies in the implementation of collective guarantees. The ruling reaffirms prior consultation as a fundamental right, requiring institutional coordination for effective reparation in accordance with international standards.