Preferencias académicas de los estudiantes de la carrera de Derecho y su vinculación con los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) a través del estudio de sentencias

Abstract

Abstract: Ruling No. 380-16-SEP-CC of the Constitutional Court of Ecuador deals with an extraordinary protection action filed by Nelson Urbano Cabrera Heredia, who challenges judicial decisions that forced him to pay alimony as a subsidiary obligor. The plaintiff, Mr. Cabrera, states that there are acts that are not motivated, specifically in the resolution in which his appeal is denied, given that the judges would not have justified their decision, pointing out that he must continue with his obligation as subsidiary responsible. in reference to the payment of alimony to the minor, who is the daughter of the principal obligor, Mr. Juan Cabrera. The Constitutional Court carries out an analysis identifying that the order issued by the Single Chamber of the Provincial Court of Pastaza does not comply with the parameters of logic and understandability, which are the main elements that support the guarantee of motivation. In such a way that this case is specifically related to SDG 16 since it promotes societies of peace, with environments of justice and the formation of solid institutions with efficiency and responsibility.