Preferencias académicas de los estudiantes de la carrera de derecho y su vinculación con los objetivos de desarrollo sostenible (ODS) a través del estudio de sentencia

Abstract

Abstract: This research work deals with the analysis of ruling number 34-19-IN/21, issued by the Constitutional Court in which they verify the legality of articles 149 and 150 of the Comprehensive Criminal Organic Code relating to the criminalization of consensual abortion. in cases of female victims of rape because the phrase, in a woman who suffers from a mental disability contained in article 150 paragraph 2 of the COIP, has generated great discussion in different bodies that regulate women's rights, so after several arguments against that phrase and with seven votes in favor, Judge Karla Andrade Quevedo declares said phrase unconstitutional based on arguments that constitutional judges deduce about this article mainly verifying that these arguments are related to the legal norms that show the violation of the rights guaranteed in our Constitution of the Republic, at the same time it provides that the Ombudsman prepares a bill that regulate the voluntary interruption of pregnancy in cases of rape, based on the criteria established in this decision.