Preferencias académicas de los estudiantes de la carrera de derecho y su vinculación con los objetivos de desarrollo sostenible (ODS) a través del estudio de sentencia

Abstract

Abstract: The research analyzes aspects related to violated rights mentioned in Judgment No. 3-19-JP, which requests the National Court of Justice to establish the respective constitutional review. A study was conducted to determine the validity of the legal criteria applied to the protection of women's rights, covering the need to establish specific pronouncements on the right to work of pregnant women, the right to equal opportunities, the right to sexual privacy, among others. Under the resolution of the aforementioned judgment, a precedent is sought to be set regarding the omission of women's rights and the obstruction of their development. Therefore, a comparative analysis was chosen with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which were identified as an element that allows for the identification of violated rights and relevant aspects based on the objectives pursued. It was established that the processes carried out by the Constitutional Court to recognize the rights of vulnerable groups impact the full validity, respect, and guarantee of these rights.