Preferencias académicas de los estudiantes de la Carrera de Derecho y su vinculación con los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) a través del estudio de sentencia

Abstract

Abstract: The Judgment 84-20IS-23 of the Constitutional Court of Ecuador, in the context of a noncompliance action filed by Ms. Carmita Floresmilo Tinoco and others requesting enforcement of a judgment issued on November 16, 2018. The Court examines the lack of compliance with the ordered measures, considering that a considerable amount of time has passed without implementing these decisions, which has affected the rights of the plaintiffs. The Court emphasizes that judges have the obligation to employ all necessary means to ensure the enforcement of their judgments and may apply corrective and coercive measures, such as financial penalties, in the event of noncompliance being waived. Furthermore, it establishes that the Court may modify the reparation measures if circumstances warrant, it without this requiring a new hearing on the merits of the case. Finally, the Court accepts the non-compliance action and decides to adjust the measures to ensure reparation for those affected.