Preferencias académicas de los estudiantes de la carrera de derecho y su vinculación con los objetivos de desarrollo sostenible (ODS) a través del estudio de sentencia

Abstract

Abstract: This research paper, entitled "Academic Preferences of Law Students and Their Connection to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Through the Study of Judgments," seeks to strengthen legal training oriented toward sustainable development. A jurisprudential analysis is conducted of Judgment No. 2301-18-EP/23 of an extraordinary protection action filed by Judge Daniela Salazar Marín of the Constitutional Court of Ecuador. This action is filed by Ms. María Edelina Poaquiza Cambo against the July 12, 2018, ruling issued by the Provincial Court of Justice of Tungurahua partially accepting the appeal filed by Mr. Ángel Isaías Chisag, amending the first-instance ruling and ordering payment of three hundred ninety-nine dollars and twenty cents from the date of service of the complaint. The Constitutional Court determined that the contested court decision violated the right to legal certainty, given that it set the alimony amount from the summons and not from the filing of the alimony claim.