Preferencias académicas de los estudiantes de la carrera de derecho y su vinculación con los objetivos de desarrollo sostenible (ODS) a través del estudio de sentencia

Abstract

Abstract:This work is based on judgment No. 257-15-SEP-CC, which analyzes an extraordinary action of protection based on articles 94 and 437 of the Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador, against the judgment issued on November 8, 2010 by the Third Criminal and Traffic Chamber of the Provincial Court of Justice of Guayas. The plaintiff alleges that the judgment violated her constitutional rights to due process and legal certainty. The Constitutional Court, upon analysis, concluded that indeed the sentence issued lacks fundamental requirements of logical motivation and comprehensibility, and the judges of the Third Criminal and Transit Chamber of the Provincial Court of Justice of Guayas exceeded their designated functions by issuing a sentence and attributing to themselves decisions that did not correspond to them by issuing a sentence in the case of the precautionary measure action 0801-2010/A and 659-2-2010, without notifying Mrs. Rosa María Toledo of the process, in relation to SDG 16 in seeking to promote just, peaceful and inclusive societies, the Constitutional Court met the objective and recognized the violation of due process and ensure that the principles of justice are met. Finally, the sentence accepts the protection action filed by Rosa María Toledo Tapia and repeals the sentence issued and the precautionary measures issued by the Third Criminal and Transit Chamber of the Provincial Court of Justice of.