Motivación en las sentencias emitidas por los jueces de primer nivel en Ecuador

Abstract

Abstract: This paper analyzes the reasoning behind Judgment No. 11313-2024-00267, issued in a child support case under the jurisdiction of Family, Women, Children, and Adolescents in Ecuador. Using an analytical approach and methodologies such as the EL SER method, and questionnaires assessing sufficiency and correctness, the judicial action is evaluated according to constitutional and legal standards. The results indicate that the judgment is properly reasoned, prioritizing the best interests of the child and due process, without deficiencies that would require annulment or correction on appeal. The main contribution lies in strengthening the quality of Ecuadorian jurisprudence, promoting balanced decisions in child support litigation, reducing motivational flaws, and ensuring effective child protection. It contributes to judicial and academic training, offering a model for systematic reviews that optimize effective judicial protection.