Motivación en las sentencias emitidas por los jueces de primer nivel en Ecuador

Abstract

Abstract: The current research focuses on the critical study and comprehensive evaluation of the correct and sufficient reasoning in the judgments issued by first-level judges in Ecuador, a fundamental element of due process. The study analyzes the factual and legal basis of these judicial decisions, which are crucial for ensuring effective judicial protection. Through the verification of established legal doctrine, relevant constitutional and legal regulations, and the detailed analysis of significant cases such as Case No. 16281-2023-00653 of the Criminal Guarantees Court based in the Pastaza Canton, this work identifies the strengths and, particularly, the weaknesses in judicial reasoning. The substantial contribution of this thesis is to present a precise and up-to-date diagnosis of the quality of reasoning in the Ecuadorian first-instance judicial system. Based on this, constructive critical reflections and clear guidelines are proposed for its substantial strengthening, seeking to significantly subsidize legal certainty, the predictability of resolutions, and the veracity of the judicial system in the country.