Motivación en las Sentencias emitidas por los Jueces de Primer Nivel en Ecuador

Abstract

Abstract: This paper analyzes the reasoning in the judgment issued in Judicial Process No. 17203-2019-05198, resolved by the Family, Women, Children and Adolescents Judicial Unit of Quito. The identified problem lies in the frequent insufficiency or inaccuracy of judicial reasoning, which affects the legitimacy of judicial decisions and the rights of the parties. The general objective is to analyze and evaluate the argumentative and legal quality of the reasoning used by the judge in accordance with current doctrinal and normative standards. The research applies the method of judgment reasoning analysis, using argumentative schematization techniques and questionnaires on the sufficiency and correctness of the reasoning to assess the congruence, coherence, and clarity of the judicial justification. The results demonstrate a solid reasoning structure based on the proven facts and the appropriate application of the relevant norms. The analysis of the appellate court's ruling confirms that the challenged decision meets the constitutional requirements of reasonableness and sufficient evidentiary assessment. It is concluded that the judicial reasoning is legally sufficient and correct, and recommendations are proposed to strengthen judicial practice in family law matters.