Motivación en las sentencias emitidas por los jueces de primer nivel en Ecuador

Abstract

Abstract: This research paper analyzes the ruling issued at the first level by a constitutional judge in the Milagro canton, regarding the protective action filed by the legal representative of a company named TEOCAC.SA. The objective is to demonstrate the violation of constitutional rights in an administrative act by the property and commercial registry of the Milagro canton. The issue addressed is presented through a protective action for violation of the right to property, within the administrative procedure of registering a cadastral code on a 15-hectare property; It was demonstrated that there was no such violation on the part of the property and commercial registry of the Milagro canton. In the course of this protection action, it was evident that the plaintiffs never presented any evidence in their favor that would support their claims, which was to annul a legitimately registered code. Given the aforementioned background and considering that the property registry of the Milagro canton had not violated any constitutional right of the plaintiffs, the judge dismissed the case as inadmissible.