Motivacion en las sentencias emitidas por los jueces de primer nivel

Abstract

Abstract: The reasoning within a judgment must be clear, concise, and consistent with the elements presented in the proceedings and the applicable laws in each case, so that the parties involved can understand why the competent authority, after analyzing and studying the proceedings, issued that decision. Therefore, the judges must comply with the constitutional standards of reasonableness, logic, and comprehensibility; that is, the right to due process must not have been violated. In light of the above, the reasoning must not suffer from motivational flaws. Similarly, the judgment's justification must not present internal or external inconsistencies. Regarding relevance, the reasons or arguments must have a direct bearing on the decision at the time it was made. On the other hand, incongruity means that the judge must apply the relevant arguments established by the law or the right; finally, within the incomprehensibility, the reasoning must not be obscure since this would cause confusion or difficult understanding even for a legal professional.