Motivación en las sentencias emitidas por los jueces de primer nivel en Ecuador

Abstract

Abstract: This study analyzes the guarantee of reasoned decision-making in an Ecuadorian first-instance judgment, specifically in case No. 23201-2022-02538, concerning a divorce based on abandonment of the marital home. The research adopts a qualitative approach with a legal analytical method, employing a documentary review of the judgment and the application of two instruments: the Questionnaire on the Sufficiency of Reasoning and the Questionnaire on Correct Reasoning. The results demonstrate that the ruling provides adequate normative and factual grounds, correctly applying Article 110, paragraph 9 of the Civil Code and Article 333, paragraph 4 of the General Organic Code of Procedures, and is supported by relevant documentary and testimonial evidence. Furthermore, the judgment demonstrates correct reasoning, characterized by logical coherence, argumentative clarity, and legal reasonableness. Consequently, the ruling respects the constitutional requirements of due process and the guarantee of reasoned decisions, establishing itself as a duly substantive and well-founded judicial decision that strengthens legal certainty and the transparency of the Ecuadorian judicial system. Its analysis provides useful academic criteria for future judicial evaluations in similar national contexts.