Motivación en las sentencias emitidas por los jueces de primer nivel en Ecuador

Abstract

Abstract: This thesis addresses the importance of reasoning in judicial decisions issued by first-level judges in Ecuador. It analyzes how judicial reasoning is a guarantee of due process, ensuring that decisions are properly substantiated, clear, and accessible. Through a critical approach, the study examines the Ecuadorian legal framework, including the Constitution and the Comprehensive Organic Criminal Code (COIP), which require reasoning in judicial decisions. It also reviews the implications of a reasoned judgment on the right to defense and access to justice. The analysis is complemented by practical examples and a reflection on flaws in reasoning, such as incoherence, insufficiency, and non-existence, highlighting their impact on judicial transparency. Finally, recommendations are proposed to improve the training of judges regarding the clarity and thoroughness of the reasoning in their judgments, promoting a more reliable and efficient judicial system.