Motivación en las sentencias emitidas por los Jueces de primer nivel en Ecuador

Abstract

Abstract: This paper analyzes the reasoning behind judgments issued by first-level judges in Ecuador, based on a study of case No. 09281-2024-01176, handled by the Criminal Guarantees Judicial Unit of Guayaquil. The argumentative quality of the judicial decision is evaluated using the criteria of sufficient and correct reasoning established by the Constitutional Court in judgment No. 1158-17-EP/21. Methodological tools such as argumentative analysis frameworks and standardized questionnaires are applied. The paper demonstrates the importance of judicial decisions not only being formally justified, but also presenting a logical and comprehensible development that allows for their review and revision. Furthermore, potential deficiencies in the normative and factual basis are identified, and recommendations are proposed to improve the quality of judicial decisions. This study contributes to the consolidation of the rule of law, promoting respect for due process and strengthening legal certainty.