Motivación en las sentencias emitidas por los jueces de primer nivel en ecuador

Abstract

Abstract: This written work analyzes judicial reasoning in the context of civil case No. 17233-2018-03831, addressing its function as a guarantee of due process, which is essential for ensuring the transparency and legitimacy of judicial decisions. Therefore, the logical structure of the judgment issued by the Civil Judicial Unit of Quitumbe is examined, highlighting the use of the promissory note as an enforceable instrument and the subsequent recognition of payment as a cause for the extinction of the obligation. Through a doctrinal and jurisprudential approach, deficiencies in the reasoning were identified, such as insufficient argumentation and a lack of in-depth evidentiary evaluation. The analysis compares national and international standards, emphasizing the role of reasoning as a fundamental element for defense, judicial review, and the prevention of abuse of judicial power. Therefore, it is concluded that, although the judgment formally meets the legal requirements, it lacks substantial support to strengthen its constitutional legitimacy.