Motivación en las sentencias emitidas por los jueces de primer nivel en Ecuador

Abstract

Abstract: This thesis offers a critical analysis of judicial motivation in first-instance rulings on constitutional protection actions, focusing specifically on the decision in Case No. 17204-2024-04166. By examining the quality of the judge's arguments and the legal reasoning provided, this study evaluates their alignment with the fundamental principles of due process, legal certainty, and effective judicial protection within the constitutional order. The objective is to foster reflection, both in academic and practical contexts, on the need for sound legal argumentation that respects constitutional mandates. By focusing on first-instance decisions that, due to their proximity to the facts and the parties involved, directly impact the protection of fundamental rights and access to justice, this work ultimately seeks to address a vital concern: the public perception of transparency and impartiality within the justice system.